Help us protect civil liberties — donate before 6pm on Wednesday, April 1!

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.
Last updated on November 10, 2026
Automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras are rapidly being installed in Rhode Island but are virtually unregulated in our state. Many ALPR cameras, such as those made by the brand Flock Safety, are continuously collecting data that can be kept and accessed by law enforcement agencies across the country. In short, we’re being surveilled as we travel through our state. Learn more about ALPR cameras, and what you can do to help protect privacy in our communities.
Providence: On Thursday, November 12 at 5:30pm the Providence Special Committee on Health, Opportunity, Prosperity, and Education (HOPE) is discussing and potentially voting on an ordinance to ban city-owned ALPR cameras in Providence!
–> If you are a Providence resident, fill out this form to send a message to the Committee!
We urge residents to email the whole committee in SUPPORT of a ban on ALPRs, and to show up to the meeting. Residents, please note: This may be your ONLY opportunity to provide public comment — we encourage you to attend the meeting!
The Special Committee members are:
Meeting details:
Thursday, November 12, 2026 at 5:30pm
City Council Chamber (3rd Floor)
25 Dorrance Street
Providence, RI 0290
Lincoln: On Tuesday, October 20, the Lincoln Town Council referred a resolution to create a subcommittee to evaluate Flock Safety technology and its intended use to the ordinance committee, so the ordinance committee can broaden the resolution to include all automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras. If the subcommittee recommends implementation to the Council, they will likely also suggest a proposed policy regulating the 12 ALPR cameras that the Town already began installing, but paused earlier this year.
Governor McKee’s Camera Installation Pause: As of October 19, Governor McKee has indefinitely paused the installation of RI State Police ALPR cameras until legislation can be passed by the RI legislature. The existing Flock Safety systems will continue to be in use. The ACLU of RI will lobby for a bill with strong and meaningful privacy protections, and will continue to call on cities and towns that have these systems to cancel their contracts with Flock Safety.
Read our initial statement in response the proposed policy after the 60-day pause. We will post a more thorough review of the proposal in the coming days.
Woonsocket: The Woonsocket City Council passed an ordinance to govern the 15 City-owned ALPRs on Monday, October 19. We sent them a letter before the first reading with concerns about the proposed ordinance, which does not adequately protect privacy, but the council did not accept our suggested amendments.
Cumberland: The Cumberland Town Council voted 6-1 on Wednesday, October 7, to support the mayor’s cancellation of the contract!
Hopkinton: The Hopkinton Town Council discussed Flock cameras with the Chief of Police at their meeting on Monday, October 5. Hopkinton currently has only RI State Police-owned camera(s).
East Greenwich: The RI State Police informed the Town Council the three cameras in EG are “disabled” but are still installed. The Council has delayed taking action until the results of the Governor’s 60-day pause.
Foster: The Town Council voted unanimously on Thursday, September 10 to cancel their Flock Safety contract!
North Kingstown: The Town Council voted 3-2 on Monday, August 18 to cancel their Flock Safety contract!
Glocester: The Town Council voted 4-1 on Thursday, August 6 to cancel their Flock Safety contract!
Narragansett: The Town Council voted unanimously on Monday, August 3 to cancel their Flock Safety contract!
South Kingstown: The Town Council voted unanimously on Monday, July 27 to cancel their Flock Safety contract!
Tiverton: On Monday, July 27, the Town Council voted 3-1 (with three absent) to approve a Flock Safety contract for four cameras subject to the solicitor’s review, and the addition of a termination clause. The Council had previously allocated $23k for the cameras in the budget.