REPORT: Bowdler's Legacy - Internet Censorship in RI Public Libraries (Sept 2003)

Document Date: September 8, 2003

A 2003 U.S. Supreme Court decision, United States v. American Library Association, created an unfortunate exception to the basic principle that the internet should not be censored. This report is a survey of RI public libraries' policies governing “blocking software” and Internet access. The survey is identical to one conducted in 1997, when blocking software was first gaining attention. This report reviews the results of the survey, analyzes the U.S. Supreme Court ruling and its impact for local libraries, and concludes with recommendations designed to limit that impact.

Related Content

News & Commentary
Placeholder image
  • First Amendment

RI ACLU Releases Report on Internet Censorship in Public Libraries

The ACLU of Rhode Island today released a report that both shows that most public libraries in the state oppose the use of censoring software for their computers with Internet access, and that calls upon libraries to take steps to minimize the impact of a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision which will now require most of them to nonetheless install so-called “blocking software.”
News & Commentary
Placeholder image
  • First Amendment

Access to Internet Materials at Public Libraries Increased

Responding to a report released earlier this year by the RI ACLU, the state’s library network has revised its Internet filtering procedure to increase access to information for public library patrons, addressing ACLU fears that libraries were “inappropriately discouraging or barring patron access to constitutionally protected material.”