The Affiliate successfully opposed a bill that sought to expand the definition of criminal “harassment” to include not just unwanted direct contact, but also the posting of information on Web sites about people. If passed, the bill could have subjected innumerable Internet users and bloggers to criminal penalties if their criticism of people or businesses was deemed to be designed to cause “substantial emotional distress.” After the ACLU argued that the bill raised serious free speech concerns, Representative Edith Ajello and Senator Charles Levesque persuaded fellow Judiciary Committee members to remove problematic language from the legislation.
Cyberharassment
Session
2008
Position
Oppose
Related Issues
Related content

R.I. Latino Arts Argues in Court that “Gender Ideology” Is Still...
July 1, 2025
Settlement Reached in Smithfield School District Social Media...
July 1, 2025
RI Coalition Against Domestic Violence Seeks Injunction Against...
June 30, 2025
RI Coalition Against Domestic Violence v. Bondi
June 16, 2025
Challenging New Federal Grant Requirements, ACLU Of RI, Lawyers’...
June 16, 2025
ACLU and RWU Law School Clinic Sue Again Over ACI’s Failure to...
June 13, 2025
Smith v. RI Department of Corrections
June 13, 2025
NEWSLETTER - 2025 - Spring
June 1, 2025