Rhode Island Latino Arts v. National Endowment for the Arts

  • Filed: March 6, 2025
  • Status: Active
  • Court: United States District Court of Rhode Island
  • Latest Update: Mar 05, 2025
Orange graphic with black text that says “First Amendment, Free Speech & Expression” and “Rhode Island Latino Arts v. National Endowment for the Arts”

Artists and theater groups are challenging a new certification requirement and funding prohibition for National Endowment for the Arts’ grant applications that requires applicants to attest that they will not “promote gender ideology” in order to be eligible for funding, and blocks any projects that reasonably appear to “promote gender ideology” from getting an award.

The suit argues that the new certification requirement and funding prohibition violates the Administrative Procedures Act, the First Amendment, and the Fifth Amendment. The ACLU is asking for a preliminary injunction before the grant application deadline on March 24.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Rhode Island, David Cole, and Lynette Labinger, cooperating counsel for the ACLU-RI, filed the suit in the U.S. District Court of Rhode Island on behalf of Rhode Island Latino Arts (RILA); National Queer Theater (NQT); The Theater Offensive (TTO); and the Theater Communications Group (TCG).

Case Number:
25-cv-0079
Attorney(s):
David Cole, Lynette Labinger
Partner Organizations:
National ACLU

Arts Organizations Push for Answers in National Endowment for the Arts Funding Suit

Four arts and theater organizations filed an amended complaint today in federal court in Rhode Island in their First Amendment lawsuit against the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA).

Orange graphic with black text that says “First Amendment, Free Speech & Expression” and “Rhode Island Latino Arts v. National Endowment for the Arts”

Artists Mount First Amendment Challenge to New Grant Requirements for National Endowment for the Arts

Artists and theater groups have today filed a lawsuit challenging a new certification requirement for National Endowment for the Arts’ grants that requires applicants to attest that they will not “promote gender ideology” in order to be eligible for funding

Court Denies Preliminary Relief to Arts Organizations

Though court agreed that NEA funding bar for projects that promote “gender ideology” would likely violate the First Amendment, court refused to expressly block the NEA from reimposing that bar

RILA v. NEA - Case Update

Court Hears Arguments in First Amendment Challenge to Federal Arts Funding Restriction

Changes to NEA policy in response to ACLU lawsuit do not solve the problems for arts organizations or deprive court of jurisdiction, attorneys argue

Court Hears Arguments in First Amendment Challenge to Federal Arts Funding Restriction

Related News & Podcasts

News & Commentary
May 12, 2025
Orange graphic with black text that says “First Amendment, Free Speech & Expression” and “Rhode Island Latino Arts v. National Endowment for the Arts”
  • First Amendment

Arts Organizations Push for Answers in National Endowment for the Arts Funding Suit

Four arts and theater organizations filed an amended complaint today in federal court in Rhode Island in their First Amendment lawsuit against the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA).
News & Commentary
Mar 06, 2025
  • First Amendment

Artists Mount First Amendment Challenge to New Grant Requirements for National Endowment for the Arts

Artists and theater groups have today filed a lawsuit challenging a new certification requirement for National Endowment for the Arts’ grants that requires applicants to attest that they will not “promote gender ideology” in order to be eligible for funding
News & Commentary
Apr 02, 2025
RILA v. NEA - Case Update
  • First Amendment

Court Denies Preliminary Relief to Arts Organizations

Though court agreed that NEA funding bar for projects that promote “gender ideology” would likely violate the First Amendment, court refused to expressly block the NEA from reimposing that bar
News & Commentary
Mar 27, 2025
Court Hears Arguments in First Amendment Challenge to Federal Arts Funding Restriction
  • First Amendment

Court Hears Arguments in First Amendment Challenge to Federal Arts Funding Restriction

Changes to NEA policy in response to ACLU lawsuit do not solve the problems for arts organizations or deprive court of jurisdiction, attorneys argue