Significant and respected commentary in the academic and judicial communities note that a federal constitutional convention, once called, could become an unlimited and wide-ranging free-for-all and propose any number of constitutional amendments it chose to. We opposed this resolution which would call for a federal constitutional convention with the goal of passing constitutional amendments that would “impose restraints on the federal government.” We noted that this broad language could allow for any number of special interest groups – and their money – to propose harmful constitutional amendments.
Federal Constitutional Convention (H 5188)
Sponsors
Representative Arthur Corvese
Related Issues
Related content

ACLU Report Calls on City And Town Councils, School Committees to...
May 31, 2023
REPORT: Remote Access to Public Meetings Post-Covid (May 2023)
May 31, 2023
School Safety Protocol Commission (H 6422)
May 26, 2023
Remote Public Participation in Open Meetings (H 5722, S 815)
April 7, 2023
Police Officer Certification and De-Certification (H 6181, S 811)
April 7, 2023
Access to Public Records Act Reform (H 5454, S 420)
April 7, 2023
Police Records & APRA (H 5442)
April 6, 2023
Open Meetings Translation (H 5616, S 122)
April 6, 2023