Significant and respected commentary in the academic and judicial communities note that a federal constitutional convention, once called, could become an unlimited and wide-ranging free-for-all and propose any number of constitutional amendments it chose to. We opposed this resolution which would have called for a federal constitutional convention with the goal of passing constitutional amendments that would “impose restraints on the federal government.” We noted that this broad language could allow for any number of special interest groups – and their money – to propose harmful constitutional amendments. This bill died in committee.
Federal Constitutional Convention (H 5188)
Sponsors
Representative Arthur Corvese
Related Issues
Related content

ACLU Sues Over Social Media Censorship by Smithfield School District
June 9, 2025
Mayer v. Town of Smithfield
June 9, 2025
ACLU Sues Brown University Police for Refusing to Provide Arrest...
June 2, 2025
Bilow v. Brown University Department of Public Safety
June 2, 2025
Human Trafficking Exception to APRA Disclosures (H 5878)
May 1, 2025
TESTIMONY Re: Proposed Amendments to RI Court Rules
April 11, 2025
Disclosing Salaries of Non-Profit Applicants Seeking Grants from...
April 4, 2025
Access to Public Records Reform (S 909, H 5457)
April 4, 2025