The information below is about the First Amendment rights of K-12 public school students in Rhode Island.

Keep in mind that school policies on issues that may affect your exercise of First Amendment rights can vary from district to district, so you should check your student handbook for details.

Last Updated: January 2023

The information below should not be taken as legal advice. If you have additional questions, or if you feel your rights have been violated, please contact the ACLU of RI. 

Additional resources:




  • FREEDOM OF RELIGION - Freedom of religion means the right to practice whatever religion we choose – or no religion at all – without the government getting involved or promoting religion itself.
  • FREEDOM OF THE PRESS - Freedom of the press is the right to publish and distribute information to others.
  • FREE SPEECH AND EXPRESSION - The right to free speech is the right to speak our mind, share ideas and beliefs, and express ourselves.
  • FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY - The right to peacefully assemble means we have the right to gather in groups and to peacefully protest.
  • FREEDOM TO PETITION - Freedom to petition is the right to sue the government for violating our rights, and to lobby for laws and policies that we believe in.




Freedom of religion means the right to practice whatever religion we choose – or no religion at all – without the government getting involved or promoting religion itself.

There are two parts to the First Amendment right to the “freedom of religion.” The first part is that the government cannot do things that promote religion or have a religious purpose.  This means that public school officials – who are part of the government – must be neutral when it comes to religion and may not endorse or impose any religious ideas on students. The second part of this right is that everyone has a right to practice the religion of their choice – or no religion at all – without the government interfering. In public school, this means that students are free to practice their religion as long as they do not disrupt school activities or violate the rights of others. This includes wearing religious symbols or clothing, talking about their faith with others, and inviting others to join religious groups.

In line with the two components of religious freedom described above, students have the right to pray alone or in groups among themselves, and to discuss their religious views with their peers as long as they are not disruptive and don’t force other students to participate. Students can also hand out religious literature in school as long as they obey school rules about distributing written materials. However, school officials – whether teachers or administrators – are not allowed to encourage or lead classes in prayer or try to persuade students to participate in religious activities. In a case from Rhode Island, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that schools could not have prayers – even so-called non-denominational ones -  at graduation ceremonies. And in a more recent Rhode Island case, a court ruled that a school could not maintain a prayer mural that had been displayed for many years in the school auditorium. It is not enough to tell students that they don’t have to participate in prayer or other religious exercises; it is no business of public schools to be involved in any way in religious exercises. 

Although schools cannot promote religion, teaching about it is fine. Thus, students can study religion for its influence on history, literature, and culture. In doing so, however,  school officials may not preach their religious beliefs to students, and schools cannot design curricula that promote some religious views over others.

With respect to the holiday season, the guiding principle is that government should be neutral between religions as well as between religion and no religion.  Accordingly, an attempt to promote religious holidays by including all religions in school celebrations is not adequate since many students either do not have any religious beliefs or they follow faiths that do not have a “holiday” season.  Of course, schools can celebrate holidays by putting up decorations and displays, but they must be careful not to promote a religion in particular by emphasizing those holiday symbols that have religious meaning. However, if a display is mostly non-religious, it is probably okay. For example, a nativity scene by itself would probably not be permitted, but a display including several items, like a Christmas tree, a Menorah and snowflakes would be lawful.




Freedom of the press is the right to publish and distribute information to others.

In 2017, the RI legislature passed a law – the Student Journalists’ Freedom of Expression Act – that promotes a free and responsible student press in schools.  The law reversed an unfortunate 1988 Supreme Court decision (Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier) that gave school officials wide discretion to censor “school sponsored” student newspapers.  The Hazelwood decision has had a chilling effect on student journalism across the country. The 2017 law gives students, rather than school administrators, the right to decide the content of the school newspaper or other school-sponsored media. Thus,  students can write about topics that are unpopular or controversial without being subject to discipline or censorship. Of course, some types of speech – such as libel or obscenity – remain prohibited in school and other settings.  The law also bars schools from taking action against school media advisors for protecting student journalists from administrative censorship. 

In the case of non-school-sponsored publications, the school has even less control. School authorities do not have the right to review the contents of underground publications before distribution. Students may distribute underground newspapers on school grounds before and after school and between classes, subject to reasonable restrictions on time, place, and manner of distribution. A Rhode Island court case protects the right of students to not only distribute, but also to sell, their underground newspaper in school. In addition to First Amendment protections, the 2017 law specifically protects “independent journalists” from being sanctioned for their activities.

Students do not need permission to bring written materials, including leaflets, newspapers or announcements, into the school building. However, in order to hand them out, students must follow the school’s lawful rules regarding distributing materials, and the school’s restrictions must apply equally to all non-school student literature. Generally, school rules that allow leafleting in hallways, but not in class, are considered reasonable, and schools may require someone to hand out leaflets instead of leaving them in big piles for people to pick up.




The right to free speech is the right to speak our mind, share ideas and beliefs, and express ourselves.

Public school students have a right to free speech.   This means that they are generally free to speak their minds and express their ideas, even if school officials and/or other students find their ideas controversial or don’t like them. Criticism of the school or its teachers or the discussion of politics, for example, are generally protected – both inside and outside of school.

Student speech that occurs at school, on a school bus, or at a school event is “at school.” A landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Tinker v. Des Moines (1969), established that students have the right to free speech at school unless their speech would cause a “material and substantial disruption” to class or school activities or would infringe on the rights of others. Speech does not create a material and substantial disruption simply because it draws attention, makes people angry, is controversial, or a school official doesn’t like it. In the Tinker case, for example, three public school students were suspended from school for wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War. The Court found that the students could not be disciplined for peacefully expressing an idea, because their behavior – wearing armbands in symbolic protest - did not disrupt educational activity or interfere with the rights of others. That said, school officials are allowed to impose reasonable restrictions on when, where, and how free speech activities can take place in order to prevent disruption of educational activities.

School officials are limited in their ability to punish students for ideas expressed on the student’s own time and outside of school.  They may sanction a student for off-campus speech only if they can make the case that it will cause a material and substantial disruption on school grounds or in school activities. More information is provided here in the context of out-of-school online activity.

Schools cannot punish students for refusing to salute the flag, recite the Pledge of Allegiance, or stand during the National Anthem. In all these instances, students can remain silently seated. Furthermore, students do not have to give officials a reason for not participating, and they do not need a parent’s permission to exercise this right. Students also cannot be forced to take oaths as a condition of attendance or participation in school-sponsored activities – including sports teams. In one case, for example, the ACLU successfully challenged a school district practice that barred students from extra-curricular activities if they refused to sign an oath condemning drug and alcohol use. While the students could be required to agree not to take illegal drugs, the school violated their First Amendment rights by essentially forcing them to take a position on whether the drugs should be illegal.

The right to free speech – by students, and private individuals more generally – does have some limitations.  Historically, freedom of speech has not included speech that directly advocates others to commit violence nor has it included threats intended to cause someone to legitimately fear for their safety.  Defamation – spoken or written falsehoods about someone that causes them actual harm – and obscenity are other areas where speech has historically been limited.

Courts have ruled that schools are allowed to limit students’ use of vulgar or lewd speech on campus. In 1986, a high school student in Washington state challenged his suspension for using sexual innuendo in a speech at a school assembly. The case, called Bethel School District v. Fraser, went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court said that schools may discipline students for speech that is vulgar or lewd and used in an inappropriate school setting. In a case called Morse v. Frederick, a student in Alaska was suspended for holding up a banner at a school-sponsored event that read “Bong Hits 4 Jesus.” The U.S. Supreme Court said that the school could limit the student’s speech because it advocated illegal drug use and did not include any serious comment on social or political issues.

The right to freedom of expression includes the right to access ideas and information. The basis for this is that information is critical to the free expression of ideas. This means there are some limits on what schools can censor.  This applies to the books that a school library makes available and to the Internet filtering software that schools use.

School computers are usually equipped with filtering software that prevents students from accessing content that officials consider inappropriate for a school setting. Unfortunately, these filters often filter out too much - like sites that provide information about sexual health or sexual identity. Although no court has decided whether a school can censor access to web pages on the Internet, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that the Internet is a participatory form of mass speech and is entitled to protection from governmental intrusion. This suggests that the Internet deserves at least as much protection from censorship as a school library, for example.

The right to freedom of expression includes the right to access ideas and information. In Board of Education v. Pico (1982), the U.S. Supreme Court said that a school couldn’t remove books from the library simply because it disagreed with the ideas expressed in them.

As for classroom texts and curricula materials, the school’s authority is very broad. However, RI law does prohibit discrimination in classroom or school practices, including things like stereotyping in textbooks and other course material.




The right to peacefully assemble means we have the right to gather in groups and to peacefully protest.

In 1984, Congress passed the Equal Access Act, which made it unlawful for schools to bar certain student-run groups - including religious ones - from meeting after school if school facilities are available to other student-run groups.  This means that students can form a religious club or a gay-straight alliance and are free to meet at school during non-instructional time if the school allows other types of clubs to meet on campus.

Because of the possibility that in-school protests can be disruptive, the courts have restricted student demonstrations on school property - particularly if they occur during school hours or in a school building. As a result, schools may have reasonable rules regulating the time, place and manner of group demonstrations. Outside of school, students have the right to assemble and express themselves in groups – via marches, protests or other forms of peaceful demonstration. Keep in mind that if you encourage students to miss class, block a hallway, or make a lot of noise while others are studying, it will likely be considered a disruption. But you should be able to organize a peaceful, orderly protest at lunch, or before or after school.




Freedom to petition is the right to sue the government for violating our rights, and to lobby for laws and policies that we believe in.

Broadly speaking, the “right to petition” means that people have the right to ask the government to change things that they don’t like – and do so without fear of punishment.  In practice, this means that people have the right to sue the government if it does something that we think is wrong – and lobby the government to pass laws that we believe in. Importantly, the right to petition makes it possible for us to protect our other rights, and seek changes when our rights have been violated. Without this right, the cases highlighted in this pamphlet may not have been possible. The right to petition also allows the ACLU of RI to go before the Rhode Island General Assembly, our State’s legislative forum, and provide evidence and arguments to support the passage of laws that protect our rights – including the rights of students.





Because the law requires you to attend school, the administration can take corrective action against you for missing class, even if you do it to participate in a political protest. But there are two important limitations on what school officials can do to you. First, a state law bars schools from issuing out-of-school suspensions because you are truant or late to class. The same limitation should apply to walkouts. In addition, the school cannot punish you more harshly for missing school to participate in political protest than for missing school for any other purpose. For example, if detention is the typical punishment for unexcused absences, that would be an appropriate penalty if you leave school to attend a protest. But the school could not give you a lengthier detention because you were involved in a walkout as opposed to just skipping class. You also should be given the same right to make up work as any other student who has an unexcused absence for the particular classes you miss.


Blocking or locking exits to the school can pose serious health and safety concerns for students and staff. If the school administration threatens to lock the doors to prevent a walkout, students should immediately notify their parents and the district superintendent’s office.