Cooperating attorneys for the American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island have filed a lawsuit against the Providence Public School District (PPSD) and the City of Providence on behalf of GoLocalProv, LLC, for providing late and inappropriately redacted public records information about a controversial bidding process for a multimillion-dollar “integrated facilities services” for the school district.

The suit comes after months of controversy around the bidding process for the over-70 million-dollars-a-year contract. The winner of the contract, ABM Industries, allegedly received a chance to enter an extra bid after its competitors, providing an unfair advantage. However, documentation of each proposal and the awarding of the contract was not released by PPSD or the City for residents to review.

GoLocal, a digital news organization that has been investigating the story, made an Access to Public Records Act (APRA) request to PPSD for the bids made by the three prospective contractors. The documents that PPSD eventually provided were heavily redacted, and appeared to completely remove financial information from the bids — the very information that GoLocal wanted to review and report on to taxpayers. The lawsuit, filed in R.I. Superior Court by ACLU of RI cooperating attorneys Fausto C. Anguilla and Lynette Labinger, argues that GoLocal “has a legal right to obtain the requested documents withheld and the requested documents redacted without redactions, and no legal basis exists for Defendants’ failure to disclose them in full.”

The complaint notes that the Request For Proposals for the bid specifically stated that “all material submitted” by vendors in response to the RFP “shall be considered to be public records…without exception…” The complaint further alleges that the City’s Home Rule Charter requires sealed bids to be opened at a public meeting. Page after page of some of the documents provided to GoLocal are completely blacked out.

The suit also places PPSD at fault for not responding to GoLocal’s APRA request within the statute’s required ten-day response time without requesting an extension. The suit seeks a court order requiring that all the records be turned over immediately and the imposition of a fine and award of attorneys’ fees.

“Rhode Islanders and, in this case, especially Providence residents should be concerned about the cover-up linked to the costs and awarding of a $72 million contract," said Josh Fenton, CEO and co-founder of GoLocal. “It is an embarrassment for the McKee administration to allow RIDE and PPSD to continue to withhold public documents.”

ACLU cooperating attorney Anguilla added: “There is a growing pattern by education officials in Providence and at the state to try and deny the release of clearly public records. We firmly believe that the public needs to know that the bidding process is fair and in the best interest of the students, parents, and fair to taxpayers.”

Related Content

Court Case
Oct 22, 2023
GoLocalProv, LLC v. PPSD
  • Government Transparency

GoLocalProv, LLC v. Providence Public School District

Cooperating attorneys for the American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island today filed a lawsuit against the Providence Public School District (PPSD) and the City of Providence on behalf of GoLocalProv, LLC, for providing late and inappropriately redacted public records information
News & Commentary
Aug 29, 2023
PLEE v PPSD Settled
  • Students’ Rights|
  • +1 Issue

RIDE, PPSD, Families Reach Settlement on Preschool Special Education Federal Complaint

Today, the Rhode Island Department of Education (RIDE), and the ACLU of RI and RI Center for Justice announced that an agreement was reached settling the federal class action complaint recently filed by Parents Leading for Educational Equity (PLEE) and three children and their parents.
News & Commentary
Apr 08, 2020
Placeholder image
  • Government Transparency

ACLU Urges Public Bodies to Abide by New Standards of Government Transparency

The ACLU of RI sent a letter to all RI municipal leaders reminding them of their obligation to help maintain government transparency in public meetings in accordance with Governor Raimondo’s recent Executive Order (EO), and supplemental guidance about the EO. In an effort to stem the spread of COVID-19, the recently released EO suspended certain provisions of the state’s Open Meetings Act, and most public bodies have since started holding their meetings remotely. Responding to concerns raised by the ACLU of RI and Common Cause regarding the impact of the EO on government transparency, the Department of Administration (DOA) released important follow-up guidance outlining a number of steps that public bodies should take when conducting meetings remotely. The ACLU of RI letter urged city and town leaders in RI to ensure that their municipalities’ public bodies are aware of, and conforming to, the new standards for transparency set forth by the EO and the Guidance, including: Holding remote meetings only if they are necessary for continued government operations, requiring audio and/or video coverage of the meetings and suspending meetings when that coverage is interrupted, having meeting attendees identify themselves prior to speaking, and, where possible, posting on the public body’s website in advance any documents to be presented at the meeting. The letter concluded by acknowledging the need for some flexibility in governance during this difficult period, but noted that “the public's right to oversee the work of its government officials and municipal bodies remains more critical than ever.” The ACLU sent the letter with the goal of helping to prevent any unintended violations of the EO and Guidance by public bodies.
News & Commentary
Oct 31, 2023
ACLU of Rhode Island Statement on the Firing of Miguel Sanchez by Governor Mckee
  • First Amendment

STATEMENT: ACLU of Rhode Island Statement on the Firing of Miguel Sanchez by Governor Mckee

We have received a number of inquiries about the legality of Governor McKee’s decision to fire Miguel Sanchez due to his expression on social media of his personal views about the ongoing war in the Middle East.