ACLU Sues Over Frozen Unemployment Insurance Payments
Posted: May 27, 2020|Category: Active Case Discrimination Rights of the Poor Due Process Right to Petition & Protest Workplace Rights
ACLU of Rhode Island cooperating attorneys Ellen Saideman and Lynette Labinger today filed a class-action lawsuit challenging the state Department of Labor and Training’s (DLT) actions in summarily freezing weekly unemployment insurance benefit payments to hundreds of Rhode Islanders without any notice or explanation.
The suit was filed three weeks after reports first emerged of the DLT freezing the payments of thousands of Rhode Island workers who had lost their employment. The lawsuit argues that the failure of the DLT to provide UI benefit recipients any notice whatsoever that their payments were being suspended violated their constitutional right to due process. While it appears that DLT has recently restored most of those suspended benefits, that is not true for the lead plaintiff Steven Hanson.
Hanson is a self-employed real estate appraiser with serious medical conditions, whose treating physician advised him to stop working two months ago because of the dangers posed by Covid-19 were he to be exposed to the virus. Hanson applied for unemployment, and received his first payment in April, but has not received one since. Seeking an explanation, he called DLT numerous times – and once waited about four hours on hold – without ever connecting to someone. To this day, he has not received any notice or explanation for the cessation of his benefit payments.
A second plaintiff, Randall Pelletier, failed to receive payments for two consecutive weeks this month. The lawsuit describes the bureaucratic nightmare he also encountered when he tried to find out why his payments had not been deposited, which included multiple unanswered website submissions to the DLT and a wait on the phone for more than two hours in an attempt to speak to someone at the agency – who ultimately was unable to provide any explanation. His benefits were restored last week but, like Hanson, he never received an explanation for the hold-up of his benefits, and he fears that, as a seasonal worker, it could happen to him again.
In arguing that the DLT’s failure to provide recipients any advance notice of the suspension of benefits violates their rights to procedural due process, a memorandum of law filed with the complaint notes that “the stopping of UI without any notice lacks fairness and reliability.” The suit seeks a court order declaring unconstitutional the agency’s failure to provide notice, and barring further suspensions of UI benefits without adequate advance notice to the affected recipient. The DLT’s actions this month came as the federal government announced an investigation of unemployment insurance fraud in a number of states, including Rhode Island.
ACLU attorney Saideman said today: “So many families depend on unemployment in these hard times. It is outrageous that DLT is stopping benefits without any notice at all.” ACLU attorney Labinger added: “In these times of great uncertainty as to what comes next, and when people are financially struggling, they should not be subjected to a weekly guessing game as to whether benefits for which they have qualified will actually be provided.”