Last year, Providence city officials persuaded the General Assembly to approve a bill authorizing the installation of automated “red light cameras,” but only after accepting a bevy of ACLU amendments designed to mitigate some of the privacy and due process concerns they raise. Significantly, a three-year sunset clause was included in the law. However, on the last day of this year’s session, Providence Rep. John McCauley tried to get the sunset clause repealed. In a matter of hours, the bill was heard by, and reassigned to, two different committees, until it was finally sent to the floor for a vote. Thanks to a concentrated Affiliate lobbying effort, the full House took no vote on the bill. The ACLU pointed out to legislators serious questions about the cameras’ effectiveness, and noted that the purpose of the sunset clause was to give officials the opportunity to review data after a few years of their use.
Red Light Cameras
Session
2006
Position
Oppose
Related Issues
Related content

Reproductive Freedom and Gender Affirming Care Health Data Privacy...
May 2, 2025
Social Media Regulation Act (H 5291, S 929)
April 4, 2025
School Cell Phone Policies (S 771, H 5598)
April 4, 2025
Removing Cooperation Requirement for Assistance from Child Care...
April 4, 2025
Restrictions on Police Surveillance Cameras (H 5659)
March 31, 2025
Preventing Civil Arrests in Court (S 291, H 6121)
March 18, 2025
Parking Mobility App Program (H 5883)
March 18, 2025
Speed Camera Expansion (H 5930)
March 17, 2025