RIHAP v. Cranston - A court case that The ACLU of Rhode Island is currently involved in.

Menu

Protecting Civil Liberties in Rhode Island for Over 50 Years

Court Cases

Print
Share This
  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Twitter

RIHAP v. Cranston (2017)

Category: Active Case    Discrimination    Rights of the Poor    Free Speech    


About This Case:
This is a federal lawsuit against the City of Cranston over an anti-panhandling ordinance enacted by the City Council in 2017.  The suit was filed on behalf of Francis White, Jr., who is disabled and formerly homeless, as well as the Rhode Island Homeless Advocacy Project (RIHAP) and two Cranston residents – Karen Rosenberg and Deborah Flitman.  The suit argues that the ordinance violates the First Amendment right of individuals to solicit donations and distribute literature on Cranston roadways.   In April 2016, the ACLU favorably settled a lawsuit against Cranston over a similar ordinance that barred the solicitation of donations from motorists. In that settlement, the City acknowledged that the ordinance violated the First Amendment and halted its enforcement. The 2017 ordinance makes several cosmetic revisions to the original in an attempt to pass constitutional muster.

Current Status:
In August 2017, Judge William Smith issued a temporary restraining order halting enforcement of the ordinance.

ACLU Cooperating Attorney:
Lynette Labinger

Related Documents
Related News Releases
  • Aug 03, 2017 - Judge Issues Restraining Order Against Cranston Anti-Panhandling Ordinance
  • Jul 18, 2017 - ACLU Again Sues Cranston Over Anti-Panhandling Ordinance
  • Apr 13, 2016 - ACLU Settles Suit Over Cranston Ordinance Barring Roadside Solicitations
  • Dec 16, 2015 - ACLU Files Suit To Challenge Cranston Ordinance Barring Roadside Solicitations