| Church and State | Criminal Justice | Discrimination | Due Process | Free Speech |
| Immigration | Open Government | Police Practices | Privacy | Students' Rights |
Church and State Court Cases
For years, the Rhode Island ACLU has fought to maintain the separation of church and state. At the same time that the Affiliate has worked diligently to prevent government aid to religion, it has also been just as assiduous in protecting the free exercise of religion from government interference.
Rogers V. Mulholland. (2009-ongoing)
The lawsuit, filed on behalf of seven Pawtucket parents and their children,
charging that the Parks and Recreation Division has, for a number of years, given preferential treatment to parochial schools over public schools in granting permits for the use of city athletics fields.
The lawsuit seeks a court order declaring unconstitutional both the preferential treatment to religious schools and the City’s lack of any objective standards for granting permits for use of the fields. Cooperating Attorney: Sandra A. Lanni.
News Release | Lawsuit
Spratt v. Wall. (2006-2007)
RELIGIOUS FREEDOM. Appeal of a federal court ruling upholding a warden’s decision to bar an inmate from supervised preaching at religious services even though he had done so for seven years without incident. The appeal argues that the ban violates a federal law guaranteeing religious freedom to institutionalized persons. The appellate court reversed the lower court ruling, and the state subsequently adopted a new policy in accordance with the federal law, and also agreed to pay damages and attorneys’ fees. Cooperating Attorneys: Lynette Labinger, Carly Iafrate. Learn More
Osediacz v. City of Cranston. (2003-2005)
FREEDOM OF RELIGION. Federal lawsuit challenging both the display of a nativity scene and menorah on the front lawn of Cranston City Hall and city policies governing what displays may be erected. In 2004 the court upheld the display’s constitutionality but struck down the policies, but in 2005 an appellate court ruled the plaintiff didn’t have standing to challenge the policies. Cooperating Attorneys: Miriam Weizenbaum, Amato DeLuca.
Learn More
